<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>NetTech Corp &#187; windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/tag/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog</link>
	<description>Technology, Innovations and Experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft’s Next OS To Be Called “Windows 7″. Seriously.</title>
		<link>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/10/microsoft%e2%80%99s-next-os-to-be-called-%e2%80%9cwindows-7%e2%80%b3-seriously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/10/microsoft%e2%80%99s-next-os-to-be-called-%e2%80%9cwindows-7%e2%80%b3-seriously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Microsoft has announced that the latest version of Windows, due in the next couple of years, will be called - drumroll please - Windows 7 . It&#8217;s about time Microsoft adopted a naming system that might actually make some sense to users, but I can&#8217;t wait for hordes of customers to start asking if they somehow missed Windows 1 through 6. Windows has had one of the most ridiculous naming schemes in the history of software. First there were logical (but ugly) version numbers, like the once commonplace &#8220;Windows 3.1&#8243;. Then with the release of the overhauled Windows 95 the company adopted a naming system based on the year of release, which it continued until Windows 98. Windows Me (perhaps the worst operating system I&#8217;ve ever used), sacrificed the scheme for a chance to be clever (it stood for &#8220;me&#8221; and the millennium at the same time!) Next up we hit Windows XP, which has served most of us reasonably well since 2001. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft has announced that the latest version of Windows, due in the next couple of years, will be called &#8211; drumroll please &#8211; Windows 7 . It’s about time Microsoft adopted a naming system that might actually make some sense to users, but I can’t wait for hordes of customers to start asking if they somehow missed Windows 1 through 6. Windows has had one of the most ridiculous naming schemes in the history of software. First there were logical (but ugly) version numbers, like the once commonplace “Windows 3.1″. Then with the release of the overhauled Windows 95 the company adopted a naming system based on the year of release, which it continued until Windows 98. Windows Me (perhaps the worst operating system I’ve ever used), sacrificed the scheme for a chance to be clever (it stood for “me” and the millennium at the same time!) Next up we hit Windows XP, which has served most of us reasonably well since 2001.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/windows7logo.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a title="Microsoft’s Next OS To Be Called “Windows 7″. Seriously." href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/CLIhmN9kEbU/" target="_blank">Microsoft’s Next OS To Be Called “Windows 7″. Seriously.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/10/microsoft%e2%80%99s-next-os-to-be-called-%e2%80%9cwindows-7%e2%80%b3-seriously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud + Client</title>
		<link>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/09/cloud-client/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/09/cloud-client/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This week two giants spoke to the technology wave known as cloud computing. Larry Ellison called it a new label on what everyone is doing already. He acknowledged he was going along with it to keep his marketing and sales guys happy, but basically he called bullshit on it. Steve Ballmer talked at a deep level about intelligent caching between the cloud and the client]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week two giants spoke to the technology wave known as cloud computing. Larry Ellison called it a new label on what everyone is doing already. He acknowledged he was going along with it to keep his marketing and sales guys happy, but basically he called bullshit on it. Steve Ballmer talked at a deep level about intelligent caching between the cloud and the client</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/techcrunch39.gif" alt="" /></p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a title="Cloud + Client" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/ZLf9kbG1O48/" target="_blank">Cloud + Client</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nettechcorp.com/blog/2008/09/cloud-client/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
